Dré Bly is Not a Cancer (He’s a Gemini)

>> 7.26.2010

One of the interesting things about the blogosphere is the “echo chamber” effect.  In  media, the “echo chamber” is a phenomenon where a rumor makes its way to a media source, who shares it or alludes to it, some media outlets report the rumor, many media outlets report on reports of the rumor, and eventually the sheer volume of reports bouncing off of each other become (presumptive) truth.  An example: the IrishCentral.com report that  Brian Kelly would be hired at Notre Dame, which got picked up by the Cleveland Plain-Dealer, and then the Detroit News, and then they all reported each other reporting this report that, as far as anyone knew, was only a solid guess by some dude’s alias—Sean O’Shea—at a website about everything Irish.  Not everything Notre Dame Fighting Irish, just . . . Irish.

Brian at MGoBlog completely blew up everyone involved in the O’Shea/Kelly echo chamber incident at the time, and deservedly so.  This, though, is an example of the blogging version of an “echo chamber”: since many blogs analyze news rather than report news, one blog will react to another, yet another will react to the other’s reaction, and pretty soon you have analysis of analysis of analysis of analysis . . . whether that’s better or worse than Sean O’Shea taking a well-informed shot in the dark that ricochets all over the media is debatable.

On Sunday, Tom Kowalski at Mlive.com broke down Dré Bly, as he’s done for many key/interesting Lions this offseason.  Besides some cogent, rational analysis of his skills and how they’ve aged, Killer addressed Bly’s character:

There is a notion that Bly might be something of a lockerroom cancer, but just the opposite is true. More than 90 percent of the people in the organization believed the same thing Bly did. Harrington was far from the only reason the Lions were having their issues but, because of his position, Harrington was at the center of it.

Michael David Smith over at ProFootballTalk read Killer’s Bly piece, and posted his reaction take within a few hours:

“For starters, if 90 percent of the people in the Lions' organization really agreed with Bly that ‘Millen did a great job drafting the guys,’ well, then I don't even know what to say . . .”

“None of this is to say that Harrington was a good quarterback in Detroit. He wasn't. But he was far from the only problem. And if 90 percent of the Lions' locker room in 2005 thought Harrington was the "whole problem," that just shows what a clueless group of players the Lions had. Now they've brought one of those clueless players back.”

Well, let’s hope analysis is more like parfaits, and less like onions . . . or ogres.

Let’s re-read that last sentence of Killer’s: “Harrington was far from the only reason the Lions were having their issues but, because of his position, Harrington was at the center of it.”  Yes, because of his position.  Because of his salary.  Because of his repeated failure to progress within the offense.  Because his head coach wanted nothing to do with him, and never did.  Because the front office ceded to the coach’s demands to bring in Jeff Garcia.  Because Jeff Garcia got hurt and blew chunks.  Because Matt Millen refused to admit his mistake.  Because Millen compounded his mistake over and over and over again by refusing to admit it.

Quarterbacks the lynchpin of a football team.  They touch the ball on every offensive play.  Great quarterbacking can elevate mediocre teams to the very summit of the NFL, and bad quarterback play makes everything else irrelevant.  Consequently, quarterbacks are lightning rods for public praise and criticism.  No NFL player will ever be as worshipfully adored as Brett Favre was by Green Bay—and perhaps none will be as viciously despised as Favre now is by Green Bay.

Joey Harrington wasn’t just a quarterback, he was a number three overall draft pick quarterback.  He was a franchise savior, a harbinger and herald of bright futures and blue skies.  He was paid lavishly, he was handed the the keys to the franchise—and he was absolutely unwanted.  The fans didn’t want him.  His teammates didn’t want him.  His coach didn’t want him, either (Marty Mornhinweg, on that fateful draft day, told Kowalski he was behind Harrington’s selection--but later admitted he was flim-flamming).

Not only did Harrington’s failure to click get earn Mornhinweg an awkward dismissal, Matt Millen’s pet project got Steve Mariucci run as well.  With all the drafts from 2003-2005 focusing on “giving Harrington weapons,” and not, for example, restocking the defense, a team that was finally starting to move in a positive direction got dragged back down to the bottom.

"WHAT?" you say. "Positive direction?  During the Millen Era?" Mr. David Smith’s skepticism above not withstanding . . . yeah, positive direction.  In 2004, the Lions had the 18th-best scoring defense in the NFL—which is only mediocre, but it was the last time the Lions’ defense looked nearly so good.  It was also the second-closest thing to a winning season the Lions got in the Aughts.  The 2004 season included a 4-2 start, two road wins, and a season sweep of the Chicago Bears.  Six of the ten losses were by a touchdown or less!  Yes, there was definitely positive momentum heading into 2005.

So what happened?  First, a nice opening win against the Packers—then a horrific 5-INT Harrington implosion against the Bears.  There was an only-the-Lions-get-screwed-like-this Week 3 bye to marinate on it . . . and then, a robbery.  Man, oh man, if I’d been blogging back then, you folks would have needed eye bleach to wash out the vicious, nasty things I’d have written about the Buccaneers’ 17-13 “defeat” of the Lions.

It was Harrington’s first signature comeback drive, an efficient 81-yard march ending with a well-placed 12-yard touchdown pass—that got taken away by review.  Despite the play being ruled a touchdown on the field, and the ball being in Pollard’s hands while he was in bounds, the ref overturned the call, and the Lions’ season momentum evaporated. 

Obviously, Joey Harrington was not then, never became, and likely never would have become a great NFL quarterback.  But flip that one bit from “0” to “1”, and instead of the Thanksgiving Day loss to the Falcons sealing Mariucci’s fate, it’d have been the first time the Lions dipped below .500.  Yes, that’s right: if that touchdown doesn’t get called back, the Lions carry a .500 or better record into Thanksgiving.

Instead, it all fell apart.  With fans publicly, and teammates privately, incensed with Harrington’s subpar play, Mariucci didn’t support his quarterback.  Instead, he made plain his frustration with Harrington, and propped up Jeff Garcia at every opportunity.  Mariucci’s failure to groom Harrington into a winner—and by extension, failure to make Millen look good—cost Mooch his job.  Dré Bly speaking this fact aloud didn’t make him a cancer—it made him honest.

Technorati Tags: nfl,detroit lions,profootballtalk.com,dré bly,matt millen,mlive.com,michael david smith


Big Al,  July 26, 2010 at 1:19 PM  

Damn straight!

I'll still believe that was a TD catch to my dying say. There was no way in Hell replay showed irrefutable evidence Pollard didn't make the catch!

As for PFT...when it comes to the Lions, 95% of the time they have no idea what they are talking about. OK, maybe I'm wrong. It's more like 99%.

Ty,  July 26, 2010 at 3:37 PM  

Big Al--

Yeah I was incoherent with rage about that play. The worst part was when they trotted out Mike Pereira on NFLN to explain how it really was the right call. RRGHGNNNNGHGN.

It's a lot like Jurassic Park, where so many things went so unexpectedly wrong, you feel like if one thing went different it would have been okay. Like, if Nedry hadn't double-crossed them, if the hurricane hadn't hit, if the animals hadn't spontaneously bred . . .

It's like that with this for me. Maybe if that call goes right, they win that game, and it all falls out differently. They beat Carolina instead of losing by one, 3-3 Chicago comes to town two games behind the 5-1 Lions in the division race . . . it's very, very easy to squint and see the 2005 season as a bad call away from division title contention--and Joey and Mooch and Roy and KJ and Chuck and Big Baby and Boss and Tedy and all those guys all pan out, and Millen is New Bill Parcells instead of the biggest idiot ever.



Jeremy,  July 26, 2010 at 9:39 PM  

Oh god, I hadn't thought about the Tampa game in awhile. I still remember the moment that call was overturned. I damn near broke my hand slamming it against the sofa.

editstet,  July 27, 2010 at 12:12 PM  

Ugly call. Inexcusable, really, considering that replay is to only overturn a field call if their isn't any doubt. But Harrington's overall problems had to do with recognition and general accuracy. He never was good at blitz pickup, completing less than 30% of his passes in those circumstances in his fifth season. Stafford last year hit 50% of passes when blitzed.

Ty,  July 28, 2010 at 12:06 AM  


I was apoplectic. Like I said, it's not too irrational to point to that call as Where It All Went Wrong. Not TOO irrational.


Ty,  July 28, 2010 at 12:18 AM  


Yeah, "Inexcusable" is a fantastic word for it. Where's you get that data? It's fascinating (and don't worry, I fully believe that Matthew Stafford is no Joey Harrington).


wwpope,  July 29, 2010 at 9:22 AM  

that's not even my biggest concern. i'm a lot more worried about him teaching our young CB's that it's okay to jump routes and get your ass burned deep once a game. with many more QB's going to and perfecting the pump fake, that is really dancing with the devil these days. not to mention that rodgers and cutler, both in our division, are both using the pump fake more and more often.

but i do think he's a punk who took a cheap shot in the media when he should have addressed his concerns in-house like a grown up.

Post a Comment

  © Blogger template Simple n' Sweet by Ourblogtemplates.com 2009

Find us on Google+

Back to TOP